Movie Review: Midnight in Paris

I thought the trailer for this was pretty mediocre.  Had no intention of seeing it.  The reviews started pouring in and they were all pretty spectacular (92% on RT).  Had no intention of seeing it.  A few of my friends saw it and gave me good word of mouth about it.  Had no intention of seeing it.  I had an extended weekend, though, and I had the option at one point of taking a mid-day nap or seeing a movie…  …so I finally saw Midnight in Paris…

For someone who makes a movie every year for the last however many years, Woody Allen’s track record is hard to keep positive.  Even his pairing with Larry David for Whatever Works was horrible.  I thought that was one of the worst movies of 2009.  But Midnight in Paris on the other hand I would lean towards the positive.

In classic Woody Allen fashion, it was oozing with a “socialite in despair” vibe.  That’s usually when he shines best.  Owen Wilson was good in the main role, as a successful screenwriter/struggling novelist who gets drunk while vacationing in Paris and time travels and meets a bunch of classic 1920s creative types for inspiration.  A bit of a nonsensical premise, but that’s the charm.  Overall though, this premise was interesting but also kind of pointless.  It was more or less a fun romp of name dropping a bunch of classic writers and painters.  It might excite some people to have a movie featuring F. Scott Fitzgerald and Gertrude Stein, but if the intent was to get excited whenever he ran into someone new, which is what it seemed like was the intent (Salvador Dali!  Pablo Picasso!)  it didn’t work on me.  But Hemingway was awesome though.  I would have rather watched a biography about this portrayal of Hemingway to be honest.

I guess the whole point of the movie was about finding inspiration, and it made a few interesting points about art and creativity and such.  Definitely would be a more likable film to someone if you’re into classic art and literature.  But it’s one of the fluffiest, lighthearted movies I’ve seen this year regardless.  Funny too, one of Woody’s best comedy scripts in years.  I suppose it makes an interesting comment about eras as well, about how no one thinks the era they currently live in is interesting while they live in it, even if it’s a legendary time.  Then it becomes a dream within a dream, with the 1920s people going to the 1890s, and…  …wait a second…  dream within a dream…?  Marion Cotillard is there…?  …Inception in Paris…?

Aside from Rachel McAdams character being underdeveloped and irrational, the rest of the characters were good, and the acting was great.  I think most of all it works as a love letter to Paris, full of great scenic visual stimuli and culture.  Worth checking out.  Better than a nap.

7 out of 10

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Movie Review: Midnight in Paris

  1. lainosaur says:

    ITS SO MUCH FLUFF. People fucking eat this shit up, but c’mon. Really? And i agree completely with the rachel mcadams shit. She didn’t even have to be in the movie, and it was essentially the same movie.

  2. G says:

    I saw this last night. I agree with you. Also, it’s like Woody Allen wanted this to happen to him when he was younger. I mean, wasn’t Owen Wilson basically playing Woody Allen?
    OH! AND DID YOU NOTICE HOW IT WAS KINDOF LIKE GROUNDHOG DAY? Only he didn’t really change at all BUT HE MET THE GIRL AND DUMPED THE OTHER ONE AND THEN STOPPED GOING TO OLD TIMEY PARIS EVERY NIGHT.
    And could he have hit us on the head ANY more about the whole ‘everyone things the golden age was before them and thinks the present is lame’?
    But yeah, not terrible.

  3. dinosaurboner says:

    I watched this with haruka and expected it to be god awful and boring but it was light hearted and fun so I enjoyed it. IF I WANTED A DEEP, THOUGHT PROVOKING MOVIE I WOULD HAVE WATCHED SOME KUROSAWA

    Also I felt the inez character wasn’t really there to be developed because the story wasn’t about her anyways. Actually if they developed her any more the movie would have sucked because you’d be force to think about how unrealistic their relationship really was.She was basically just supposed to be a roadblock on his path to figuring out what he really wanted. Roadblocks don’t necessarily need development, they just have to be known.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s