Movie Reviews: Rogue One, Manchester By The Sea, and Hell or High Water

01-rogue-one

It’s finally here!  The movie we’ve been waiting for since last December!  Now we can finally see the backstory behind the tragedy that jettisoned Casey Affleck’s humble New England family life into a tailspin!  Sit back, relax and enjoy the Bostonian fan service (oh, the accents!) in Disney’s Manchestah One: A Wicked Pissah Story.

Oh, and Rogue One came out, too.

 

02-rogue-one

ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY

I’ve been living under a rock, what is this?  This is the first step towards Disney having a Marvel Universe franchise on their hands, as they plan on releasing multip-  wait, what did you say?  Disney already owns Marvel Studios as well?  Oh, ok…  Let me start again.

This is the second step towards Disney having another multi-billion dollar franchise of countless movies and sequels and spin offs and – Wait, they own Pixar too, don’t they?

This is the third step towards Disney having a….

SO, HOWWWWWW WAS IT?  It is a totally fine action movie.  The final battle sequence on Jamaica Planet was pretty rad.  I don’t even hold it against them for having palm trees in Star Wars.  I mean it makes sense, if the Empire had to build a base somewhere, why not choose a tropical resort? There are even Beachtroopers (couldn’t tell if they were wearing tactical cargo shorts)!  Anyway, the second half of this movie was totally legit.  The ending (and I mean the ending before CGI Carrie Fisher) was pretty freaking great.  It wasn’t what you’d expect out of a Star Wars movie, as it was dark and downright depressing even.

But theeeeeeeen, there was that whole first half.  Which I found sloppy as hell.  And slightly boring (but not full on boring).  I think it didn’t help that most of the characters were boring, one-note archetypes.  I’m not sure if the actors did the best they could with the material given, or if the material given was brought down by the actors?  I’m going to guess the former, but I didn’t really have an attachment to many of the characters in this movie.

I know a lot of people loved Comic Relief Droid 2000, but I actually most enjoyed Forest Whitaker’s bizarre voice acting decisions and Donnie Yen’s blind wise man role which he seemed to actually be having fun with (unlike most everyone else).  One person who shouldn’t have been included at all is back-from-the-dead CGI Grand Moff Tarkin who, despite pretty impressive computer technology, only looked 90% human and distracted me to no end.  I don’t even remember a line of dialogue he said in the movie because I was just staring at how weird it was to computer animate a dead guy for a spin-off movie.

People who also didn’t need to be included were the drunken pig nosed guy from Mos Eisley, C-3PO and R2D2, and Jimmy Smits.  The only fan service throwback role I actually enjoyed was Darth Vader, and not just because Darth Vader is cool in general, but because they *actually* did something neat with him at the end of the movie.  If this movie did anything legitimately worthwhile as a lead-in to A New Hope, it was establishing a justifiable fear of Darth Vader for the rebellion.

But I don’t know, I thought it was a good movie; definitely not a great movie.  This is proof that I don’t have to love something simply because it’s a Star Wars product (I mean, I didn’t even like the prequels [to this prequel]).  Let’s see if this helps illustrate my reaction to Rogue One…  I saw Force Awakens three (maybe four?) times in theaters, and it genuinely excited me.  For Rogue One on the other hand, I don’t plan on going back to the theaters for even a second time.  I’ll watch it again when it’s on Blu-ray, but…  …it just kind of lacks the excitement needed for mouth-watering repeat big screen viewings that I don’t even expect out of just a Star Wars movie, but out of like, *any* movie.

Would you recommend it to me?  Sure.  If you’re a Star Wars fan, you’ve probably already seen it, so I don’t need to recommend it to you.  If you’re not, and you’re on the fence about it, I would say that you will be entertained (especially by the end), and you won’t regret seeing it, but you probably won’t be blown away.  I anticipate this, and a lot of the other spin-off movies, will be like the Ant-Mans of the Star Wars universe.  They’re alright, entertaining enough, but yeah, they’re just kinda there to hold you over until they bring out the big projects.  I wouldn’t call this a cash grab, because actual effort appeared to be put into it, but it also didn’t feel entirely like a passion project either.

Grade:  B-

 

03-manchester-by-the-sea

MANCHESTER BY THE SEA

This sounds boring, what is this?  I literally knew nothing about this movie other than looking at the poster once, and vaguely hearing it had good word of mouth.  Sometimes it’s nice to go into something completely blind to the marketing for it and just figuring it out as it goes along.  For all I knew, this was going to be boring awards bait, like Mr. Turner or something.  When I learned it was about a depressed Boston janitor who hates the world, I was 100% invested.

So, you liked it?  No, I kinda loved it.  It was easily the most emotionally moving experience I had at the theater this year.  I like when movies try to make my eyes water up, but I like it even better when they do it without (seemingly) trying that hard.  Don’t get me wrong, this was one of the most depressing movies I’ve possibly ever seen, and at the same time I probably laughed out loud a dozen times throughout this, too. The writing and atmosphere, and balance between the light-hearted and heart breaking tones of this film were off the charts.

And they don’t challenge the audience’s intelligence by over-explaining everything.  They give you just enough that you need to know, sometimes with just a vague visual cue, and they let you formulate the story yourself.  This is a fantastic example of how to write a good drama movie where they have a bunch of characters, and all of them have different things going on, yet at no point did I feel like they were overwhelming me with needless plot lines.  I was actually invested in (all) the characters’ lives, and at almost 2 hours and 20 minutes, I probably would have sat there if they kept it going to three hours.

And oh man, the acting…  Nuts!  If Casey Affleck doesn’t win the Oscar, I’ll be super angry.  Mind you, he did a insanely good job acting in a role that isn’t based off a real person or from a book adaptation.  That should give him extra points.  But I give credit to everyone in this, as they all tore it up.  Lucas Hedges, Michelle Williams, Kyle Chandler, Gretchen Mol; they’re all great in this.  Buuuuuuuuut, yeah, *especially* Casey Affleck.

I don’t think I really had a realistic favorite to win a bunch of Academy Awards in 2016 that I would be cool with, since everything has just kind of been “Yeah, ok, I guess that could win?”  But now I have something to root for.

Would you recommend it to me?  Yes I would, but only on the condition that you acknowledge that you’re walking into an intentionally slow-paced, very sad film with amazing character development and top-notch acting.  This is a human experience kind of movie, and you have to commit to the full emotional roller coaster, or you’ll just come back and tell me that you fell asleep.  If you’re looking for crazy bursts of energy out of nowhere and people punching each other repeatedly, well… that actually happens in Manchester By The Sea, too.  But if you’d like to see that happen in space, go see the other movie that came out this week.

I feel like kind of a lame film snob in a way for loving this movie more than the one above it.  But if you told me a week ago that I’d like a heartbreaking drama about a janitor arranging his brother’s funeral more than a new Star Wars movie, I wouldn’t have believed you.  But here we are.

Grade:  A

 

04-hell-or-high-water

HELL OR HIGH WATER

What is this?  This is the story of two sibling bank robbers in Texas (Chris Pine and Ben Foster) as they STEAL MONEY BACK FROM THE BANKS WHICH STOLE FROM THEM.  GET IT?  THE BANKS ARE THE BAD GUYS BECAUSE THEY STEAL FROM EVERYONE ELSE.  THAT’S THE PREMISE.  Sorry, I had to put that in all caps because this movie beats that point over your head repeatedly for 100 minutes.  It’s like no one can tell a story about how much banks suck anymore without being annoying about it.

So, you didn’t like it?  Nahhhh, not really.  I didn’t even know what it was until I saw it got nominated for a bunch of Golden Globes, and then I concurrently saw it was available to rent on Playstation Network.  My wife was busy with Christmas presents and I had nothing better to do, so I gave it a blind rent.  Oh, and I might add that I paused it about an hour into it, took a nap, and finished it later.

Listen, it’s not the worst movie ever made, by a long shot, but if a vast majority of people and critics watch this movie and think it’s *great*, they are freakin’ bonkers.

For starters, this is the least subtle “prestigious” movie of the year (had to include “prestigious”, because I also saw a Rob Zombie movie this year).  It just tries way too hard to punch you in the face with social commentary.  Dumb one liners are present throughout.  An old cowboy is explaining to the sheriff (Jeff Bridges) that he saw the boys rob the bank across the street, as he says “We watched them rob the banks that have been robbing us for years”.  Who says that to a sheriff?  The movie even opens up with a shot of graffiti painted on a wall of a deserted building: “$3 billion in bailouts, but none for us”.

I’m not saying that this movie *shouldn’t* have been about how the banks screwed over the brothers, but I am saying they could have told the story in a more subtle way, and without just directly yelling it in the audience’s face.  That’d be like if the X-Men movie kept inserting dialogue about how it’s actually a metaphor for gay rights.  Like, the audience figured it out through good storytelling, not through telling it like it is a dozen times.

Whoever wrote this movie went super heavy on two things:  Bank hate, and Native American jokes and/or insight.  One soliloquy even tied the two things together!  Again, subtlety this movie has not.

All that being said, I enjoyed the parts of this movie that were actually good.  There’s a handful of parts like that.  That t-bone steak scene with the waitress was pretty great.

Would you recommend it to me?  I mean, it’s not awful.  It’s just kind of mediocre and unmemorable.  If you’re looking for Texas cowboy sheriff wisdom in a modern movie, I could probably name you some better examples of things to watch instead.  No Country For Old Men is much, much better; off the top of my head.

Grade:  C-

 

Well, those are my last “full” reviews of the year!  Check back sometime next week for my annual year-end list!  WHOOOP WHOOOOOOOOOP.

Advertisements

One thought on “Movie Reviews: Rogue One, Manchester By The Sea, and Hell or High Water

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s